|
|  |
 |
 |
Straight Talk from the Editor
A Q&A with Larry Greenemeier, Associate Editor, Information Week
Topic: How is the economy changing the way you do your
job?
Q. In general, how has the economic downturn affected the
media?
A. It’s pretty obvious that ad pages are down and
magazines are much thinner than they were. Editorial departments are covering
what they want to, but in less space. At Information Week we’ve tried to
keep the core elements that readers expect, while trimming areas when space is
an issue.
Q. How do you decide what to cut?
A. It’s a top-down approach. We’ve got our core news
and feature stories that run every week. Then we trim sections such as Top of
the Week depending on space constraints. We’ve also tried to combine coverage
and be more flexible about where things will run. Our financials page, for
example, is located in different places within the book depending on where we
can fit it in. It used to have the same spot in the book every week.
Q. What stories are getting the big coverage today?
A. We’ve done a lot of coverage on the effect the
September 11th events have had on business continuity. We used to
look at business continuity in terms of outages caused by natural disaster or
human error. Now we’re looking more at cyber-terrorism and terrorist attacks
and what could happen if a business loses an entire facility as opposed to
access to a facility. From that standpoint, we’re looking at whether businesses
are increasing the types of business continuity services they buy from service
providers or hardware providers like EMC, IBM or Computer Associates.
Another interesting topic is the Enron situation, and not
only because it’s a high-profile bankruptcy case. Enron was a leader in
technology that was moving into different vertical markets. It’s an interesting
story that will live on for some time because it has so many different angles.
You can cover it in the general media, business and technology press.
Q. What companies are you covering? With fewer pages, will
it be harder to get smaller company stories in print?
A. At Information Week we’ve always had a top-down
focus. Our editors probably won’t have a problem if you write about IBM. It’s
probably going to be a little more difficult to get coverage for smaller
companies. But then we have the online version of Information Week where
there’s as much space as we want to write about these companies. So I don’t
think the economy affects what we cover as much as where we cover it. You won’t
see me covering a lot of e-service providers in the book, for example. There
isn’t enough room in the print version for this type of story because the
e-service model hasn’t proven to be a winning model. But if I want to write
about the topic, I can do it online.
Q. Does print coverage carry the same weight as online
coverage?
A. I don’t think online carries the same weight in
many company’s eyes as a hard copy sitting on someone’s desk. At Information
Week we’ve done a lot to promote online coverage. Our online writers have
to write features. We have an ongoing project to create more depth in the
online stories we cover. Whenever we write stories we have to include links to
previous stories to provide the reader with context. We’ve got online reporters
writing in the print book and vice versa. We have a dedicated online editorial
team – writers, editors, a managing editor. We’re trying to change the image of
online to be more of a formidable media presence.
Q. From a PR standpoint, what’s the best way to work with
you to get coverage?
A. We’ve always tried to focus on the end user of
technology and how technology is impacting their business. So it’s important
for the person pitching a story to provide someone who can comment on the
impact of a technology. It’s not necessarily important to write a long pitch –
a lot of times I just skim through those. Just try to provide the information
as clearly as possible and let reporters use their own judgment. We don’t
expect PR people to know everything about the company they represent. But it’s
always helpful if they can have several sources lined up on the topic they are
pitching.
Q. Are you less likely to do in-person briefings versus
phone-based?
A. We have some leeway in whether we travel or not.
Part of that is due to September 11th , part is to keep budgets
under control. But we have been traveling - I think it’s a choice. I personally
don’t want to travel as much. One good thing about being in New York is
eventually everyone comes through here – vendors, PR people, end users. So I’ve
been taking advantage of that.
[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]
|
|
|